Experienced aquarists consider safeguarding broodstock of endemic Hawaiian fish

By on Feb 04, 2012

Cirrhilabrus jordani - the Hawaiian Flame Wrasse

Flame Wrasses, a Hawaiian endemic that has been spawned, but to date never reared in captivity.

We’re pretty sure that the proponents of the Hawaiian-based anti-aquarium-trade movements will try to cherry pick an article like this for out-of-context statements that they can try to use to use against the aquarium industry. If you found your way here via anti-trade literature/websites/propaganda, well, we’d commend you for not taking things at face value.

In light of the relentless misinformation being produced by anti-trade activists, and consumed by legislators, we acknowledge that it’s better to be prepared for bad legislation that could happen.  This means strategically planning our collective conservation efforts so that we may side-step anti-aquarium efforts that would derail the aquarium industry’s ability to save Hawaii’s reef fishes from the real threats out there.

Today, the  aquarium world asks, “If we lose Hawaii as a source of marine aquarium fish, what impact does that have?”  In answering that first question, we ultimately come to another question – what can we, as individual hobbyists, do about all this?  Beyond the usual recommendation to stay informed and voice your opinion at the right time, read on for more insights into how we might address these questions and issues.

Disclaimers:

Let us categorically state that we are not encouraging every aquarist out there to rush out and buy Hawaiian reef fishes while they still can.  Let us also state that despite what groups like For The Fishes may tell the public, none of Hawaii’s endemic reef aquarium fishes are considered endangered species (or even threatened) at this point in time. Still, in a possible future where an edemic species could be at risk,  is it better for a species Pseudanthias hawaiiensis to be completely extinct, or to *maybe* still exist in captivity if it can’t continue in the wild?

Captive Breeding may be the long term answer, but…

Let’s start with breeding. Overall, captive breeding of marine fish is still “new”, emerging technology, and represents a very small subset within the marine aquarium community. But if we hope for breeding as a long term failsafe for species survival in the decades ahead, it requires everyday casual aquarists to buy what breeders are producing.

Yes, we can’t breed wrasses today, but maybe 5 or 10 years from now we might know how.  What good does it do us though, if a fantastic fish like the Flame Wrasse or the Hawaiian Longfin Anthias is off limits to breeders?

Pseudanthias hawaiiensis Male

A male Pseudanthias hawaiiensis - one of dozens of truly endemic Hawaiian reef fishes lost to hobbyists if banned.

Afterall, we couldn’t breed Crosshatch Triggerfish at the start of 2011, but by the end, Frank Baensch, a private small-scale commercial breeder, did just that.  Why aim to stifle innovation?  Why put species off limits to most marine breeders?  Someone has to experiment, to tinker.  More and more, it is aquariums that provide real change and evolution in our understandings.  And our best scientists…guess where many of them got their starts?  Aquariums…

If you are really “For The Fishes”, then you’re “for captive propagation”, but you also must realize that technological advancements take time, and it is often the private, individual home aquarist working without any profit incentive, making the breakthroughs and sharing them with the world.  Anti-trade activists who want to conserve and preserve reef biodiversity need a reality check – aquariums and breeding can potentially provide the failsafe, but you can’t simply “wish” captive bred Hawaiian Anthias into existence.  Think about the introduction of cell phones, personal computers, CD-ROMs, DVDs,  in our lifetimes.  Think about where those technologies first originated.  Think about the decades of time involved.  Marine breeding technology is faced with the same types of timelines and economies of scale, and there is always going to be some minimal ongoing need for wild-caught broodstock to ensure genetic diversity if possible.  Banning blocks captive breeding efforts, it kills off any potential failsafe for Hawaii’s endemic species.

Impacts of Bans on Species, and Entire Collection Areas – The White List

Let’s step back from breeding now and talk about the here and now for the majority of aquarists. While full bans are being considered, there is already a proposed “White List” agreed on by the West Hawaii Fisheries Council…any fish not on that list won’t be coming out of state waters on the Kona coast of the Big Island.  The last update we heard suggested that this white list was slated to go into effect either in January or February of 2012 (whether that has actually happened is an unanswerable question at this moment).  That means every fish not listed will have to be collected from one of the other, smaller Hawaiian Islands – in essence it makes them that much harder to obtain.   And maybe you’re OK with some of the endemic Hawaiian fishes shown below being harder to find than they already are:

Cirripectes vanderbilti

Cirripectes vanderbilti, the Scarface Blenny, not on the "White List"

Coris venusta

A female Coris venusta, the Elegant Coris Wrasse - another Hawaiian endemic not on the White List.

The White List is just a first step…it’s a “localized” ban on some 200 species (if it’s not one of the 40 species on the list, it’s off limits..aka. banned).  Ironically, it’s a compromise effort that aquarium fishers agreed to in an effort to save their livelihoods, to attempt to meet in the middle.  And this compromise didn’t stop anything…the calls to ban aquarium collection are louder than ever.

Will A Full Ban Automatically Mean No More Yellow Tangs?

So, what do we really lose if there is a complete ban aquarium fish collection in Hawaii?  Interestingly, some of the fish we associate with Hawaii and assume to be endemics are not in fact found only there. The Chevron Tang is found throughout Micronesia.

Ctenochaetus hawaiiensis

The Chevron Tang, Ctenochaetus hawaiiensis, can be found outside the Hawaiian Islands, but normally is collected in Hawaii.

Yellow Tangs can also be found in several other island groups, most notably the Marshall Islands. Achilles Tangs can also be found in other isolated island chains, and even are reported off the southern tip of the Baja penninsula in Mexico.

Acanthurus achilles

Acanthurus achilles, a Hawaiian staple but not actually endemic. Still, when's the last time you saw an Achilles Tang that wasn't collected in Hawaii?

So while Hawaii may be the main source, if not the sole commercial source, some of these flagship species from the Hawaiian fishery may still find their way into the aquarium hobby from other collection points, albeit at probably extremely prohibitive pricing (especially since both the Achilles and Cheveron Tangs already command prices greater than $100-200 most of the time).  Yes, it could be that the Achilles Tang might one day be on par with the Gem Tang or a Conspiculatus Angelfish.

What Will Bans Really Ban Then?

We’re not free and clear.  While some of these pseudo-endemics may find their way to breeders and aquarists through other channels, there are still many popular species that are true Hawaiian endemics, found nowhere else.  Rather than list them all here, we’re going to direct you to check out a 4-page pictorial listing of Hawaii’s endemic reef fish. (Page 1, Page 2, Page 3, Page 4).  As you look through this visual catalog, you’ll realize that some of these fish aren’t fish we keep in aquariums, but several notable species are.   Some of these species have even been bred in captivity already!

Time to Make Your Middle Name Noah!

So what is a hobbyist to do?  Well, we’re not trying to sound the alarm here, but we’re suggesting you make some rational purchases.  The one way we can circumvent any future ban would be to gather up “broodstock” today, even if we currently have no breeding knowledge or capabilities to yet apply. We all know marine fish can have stunning captive lifespans when compared to their wild counterparts. For example, the wild lifespan on the average Centropyge Angelfish might only be 1 year (Scott Michaels, 2004, page 218, 50% annual predation rate on adult Centropyge ferrugatus), but they can live many times longer in captivity (my personal C. argi are already 5+ years and still spawning nightly).  With the strong potential for long captive lifespans,  it’s conceivable that broodstock purchased today could still be quite viable if, or when, breeding becomes a necessary reality.

And don’t think you can’t do it.  Afterall, if Tony Vargas can create and ark a spawning trio of Flame Wrasses, there should be something you can do too. In the Freshwater Community, there’s a hobbyist-initiated program called CARES.  This program encourages Freshwater Breeders to set aside at least one tank in their fishroom to propagating a “CARES” species…many of which are non-mainstream species that are endangered or even extinct in the wild, persisting solely through the efforts of private breeders. Taking a page from the CARES mentality, maybe it’s time we ask experienced marine aquarists to set aside some tankspace for a rainy day.

So, to our fellow responsible aquarists – we believe it may be worthwhile to revisit the list of true Hawaiian endemics.  In your purchases this month, maybe there’s a Hawaiian fish a little more deserving of your attention. Perhaps you were considering the purchase of a Pygmy Angelfish like Centropyge argi?  Maybe you should set up a trio of Centropyge fisheri or C. potteri instead.

Centropyge potteri

Maybe it's time to get that Potter's Angelfish pair (or harem) you've been dreaming about?

Leopard wrasses have your fancy?  Make it a point to seek out Potter’s wrasses and set up a harem (or at least a pair).

Macropharyngodon geoffroy

Potter's Wrases harem anyone?

There’s no shortage of stunning wrasses endemic to Hawaii.  I can only imagine how  awesome a spawning trio of Psyche Head Wrasses would be in the hands of an expert aquarist.

Anampses chrysocephalus

Anampses chrysocephalus, a male and 2 female Psych-head Wrasses. Stunning "expert only" wrasses...I dream about breeding a fish like this someday.

Want to take the existing breeding knowledge for Filefish and attempt a new species?  Perhaps the Fantail Filefish is a better choice than whatever you were contemplating.  In the market for a Bandit Angelfish?  Well fellow reader, if you can truly afford one, you can truly afford to get it a mate.

Apolemichthys arcuatus

Apolemichthys arcuatus - if you have the money to own one, you have the money to buy it a mate!

Yes, the recurring theme here is this – even if you have no plans to breed any marine fish, perhaps you can make a small (or HUGE) contribution by consciously seeking out and establishing breeding groups of Hawaii’s endemic species.  Avoid buying single specimens at all costs, because it’s kinda hard for anyone to breed with only one specimen.  If we did ever lose access to Hawaii’s endemic fish species, and the technology to breed them was available, the aquarist with a spawning group might be able to distribute fertilized eggs to larval rearing specialists…or even just pass along the established broodstock itself to someone who can really use it for some good.

Just pick one species and make it a point to keep some broodstock safe in your tanks for a rainy day. Yes, we’re proposing that the average hobbyist can make a difference, even doing as little as simply buying a few fish and keeping them alive for years to come.

Do As We Do, Not As We Say.

And we’re not just preaching here…we’re actually doing as we suggest.  Since last fall, I’ve been working on getting at least a half dozen Blue Line Butterflyfish (Chaetodon fremblii) to keep here in my basement fishroom.  This is a species that’s fallen out of favor in the hobby (and heck, a species from a family that’s not nearly as popular these days).  This is my personal contribution to the cause.  I’ll volunteer my tankspace to the species.  I may never breed Fremblii, they may be absolute terrors to pair, but I’m going to try.  I do know Fremblii is a species I’d consider at elevated access risk.  It’s already banned via the White List, and even if non-white-list collection areas could still get it into the trade, any more comprehensive ban coming through would make it 100% unobtainable.  If we want any real hope of preserving this species in the face of catastrophic reef decline, 2012 may be the one year left to get started on the project.

Chaetodon fremblii

Chaetodon fremblii,the Blueline Butterflyfish, is the species I am desperately trying to personally ark broodstock for.

Pick A Hawaiian Species You Love, Or Can Learn To Love – Be a Steward For The Future

Since it’s likely the aquarium hobby that will be the ark for marine biodiversity in the future, it certainly looks like now is the time to make an investment in some Hawaiian broodstock.  From where I sit, I’m hoping someone else loves the Pebbled Butterflyfish (Chaetodon multicinctus) or the Lemon / Milletseed Butterflyfish (Chaetodon miliaris), and realizes that keeping half a dozen around could be the difference between having this species in the hobby 20 years from now, or not.

Chaetodon multicinctus

Chaetodon multicinctus - the Pebbled Butterflyfish - happens to be smallest maturing butterflyfish species = one of the best candidates to pair and spawn in a home aquarium - and you can only get it from Hawaii.

It may sound pie-in-the-sky, but then again, who would’ve believed that Wittenrich would get Heniochus Butterflyfish larvae to near settlement on his very first try.  Given the 10-20 year lifespan of many marine fish, it’s certainly conceivable that a conscious effort to gather up and ark some broodstock of Hawaii’s endemics now may be the difference.

Canthigaster jactator

Canthigaster jactator, the Hawaiian Whitespotted Toby. Sharpnose Puffers haven't been spawned and reared yet, but they're prime candidates for home hobbyists to tinker with. Might as well try it with a species that maybe you won't be able to get in the future (if anti-aquarium activists get their way).

In the final injustice – take a look at all of the species we just illustrated, and ask yourself how many of them you see with any regularity in your local fish stores or through online vendors.  This is the real travesty – while the Yellow Tang is the posterchild for both sides of the aquarium-ban debate, it is really dozens (or hundreds) of species harvested at varying levels (right down to truly insiginificant levels) that stand to lose out as collateral damage.  If the ban goes into place, it is the species themselves who are most at risk by having lost the one avenue that, over the long term, has the potential to ark them…the aquarium trade.

In an ideal world, the proposed bans will not become reality as they are emotionally driven and ignore the data.  However, realizing that a ban only has to pass ONCE, it makes sense to start thinking about backup plans.  Thankfully, the price of Hawaiian fish hasn’t skyrocketed yet.  If you’ve been thinking about Hawaiian fishes…maybe now is a good time to buy.

A special thanks goes out to Kevin Rezendes of Pacific Island Aquatics for allowing me to ransack his website and Facebook pages for the prefect images to illustate this article.  All images belong to Kevin / PIA and were provided with permission to exclusively republish here on Reef Builders – THANKS!

Posted in Fish, Industry, Opinion, Reef News |
Search More:  
   
  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4D27DP3L43D7TVNCF3V2KTG43M MichaelT

    Pair of Young Bandits……Check!

    ~Michael

  • http://twitter.com/AwItsLinnikins Linny

    Trio here :)

  • Anonymous

    A better idea would be limit the number of fish coming out of Hawaii.
    Maybe put a limit on how many can go to each country, so at least then Hobbyist would have a chance to get Hawaiian fish, otherwise they would all end up in the USA.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1003011279 Matt Wandell

    How many fish have commercial marine aquarium breeders placed back in the wild?  

  • http://www.facebook.com/sbheidrich Scott Heidrich

    You can harvest from a wild population of fish without harming the population.  It is called ”sustainable yield”, and can be achieved by careful attention to the fishes’ population dynamics and the proper regulation. It is a little complicated and hard to initially understand, but humans are incorporated into the natural mortality rate. I have a B.S. in Fisheries Management, and my friends have M.S.s and PhDs. I have no interest in collapsing a fishery and making it unavailable to future generations, but a complete ban on collection is a bit ignorant. I do know of reefs that have been reseeded with corals that were captive propagated, but not fish, yet.

  • http://www.facebook.com/sbheidrich Scott Heidrich

    My reply was posted as a new comment.

  • Anonymous

    I believe this was done with Bicinctus in the Red Sea already – I know I’ve read that, but can’t remember where.  We also have the introduced populations of Lionfish and Banggai Cardinalfish to point to…now neither came from breeders.  Certainly in-situ preservation is ideal, but SSPs provide the one last failsafe when all else fails.  

    It’s interesting to think about fisheries that are managed for game fish…stocking to supplement wild populations regularly occurs.  Ironically, when I was talking with the DLNR in Hawaii about the “tang release” video, they did mention that there are companies that are breeding and stocking foodfish/gamefish back into Hawaii’s waters.  I don’t know any more than that, but if you can stock those types of fish, there’s no reason OTHER types of fish couldn’t be “stocked” or “returned to the wild”.

    We know that reintroductions of extirpated fish can be difficult – look at the Great Lakes for example.  Coaster Brook trout could be considered “endangered” or “threatened”…they are certainly “nonexistant” compared to historical populations.  The PROBLEMS to why we could never expect them to return stem from a cocktail of habitat destruction and intentionally (and unintentionally) introduced non-native salmonids that have taken over the niches that the Brook Trout once filled.  On the flipside, reintroductions of cutthroat trout subspecies into their native streams do offer some success stories…provided feral brook trout are poisoned out first ( a real “hit the reset” button on the ecosystem!).  
    So from where I sit, the question now isn’t necessarily how many captive bred fish have been used to reestablish wild populations of fish, but how many species we currently already maintain that are solely surviving due to the aquarium trade.  We really can’t even talk about repopulation if we don’t have the biological material to even do the work with.  Thus, step 1 = ark, step 2 = maintain the ark, step 3 = IF everything else fails, and we manage to somehow restore the oceans, THEN we can look at the ramifications of and methods for reintroducing lost species.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1003011279 Matt Wandell

    Thanks Scott.  I certainly agree with you that we can harvest from a wild population of fish without harming the population.  I am just a bit skeptical that captive breeding of marine ornamentals is serving any need beyond that of the marine ornamental trade.  Would captive breeding of Pseudanthias hawaiiensis be neat?  Sure, because it means we could get our hands on healthy and hardy ones.  Would a captive bred population really be a “failsafe” if this species were to go extinct in the wild?  For a species like a small anthias or flame wrasse, I find that really hard to believe.  The pressure is going to be from habitat loss, not fishing or hunting.  If we are really “for the fishes”, we should be concerned with preserving habitat.  Just my 2 cents.

  • Anonymous

    Good point about coral reseeding…instantly brings to mind 
    http://www.coralrestoration.org/ - and I really think we need to point out that the techniques used in “fragging” and the coral nursery were developed and advanced mainly driven by the marine aquarium hobby and industry…not any other interest group.

  • Anonymous

    All true Matt, but again, by “failsafe” I am implying the last line of defense for preserving the biodiversity.  I worry when we put preserving habitat, and champion ongoing sustainable fisheries, at the expense of developing captive breeding technologies and driving that innovation.  (edit – for the record, we need both…I need to get broodstock responsibly afterall – see my prior articles on shifting who buys what – getting marines to mirror freshwater sourcing should be a longer term goal of the industry)

    Again, at this point we have many stunning examples that I routinely cite in FW.  Red Tailed Sharks (at one point considered extinct in the wild, yet routinely farmed for the aquarium trade), White Cloud Mountain Minnows (on the IUCN red list as well, but available at virtually any FW retailer), Imperial Zebra Pleco (banned from wild collection, available only through breeding, and unless something has changed in Brazil, facing probably wild extinction through habitat destruction as a result of that dam project).  Think about every Victorian Cichlid species that is maintained by the hobby (Hippo Point Salmon is one such example of a SSP release into the hobby..it’s now a mainstream staple and will never be lost – releasing it freed up room for other species in the LVSSP).

    I’ll strongly point you to investigate C.A.R.E.S. – they actually have marine fish listed but it’s a drastically incomplete list.  The priority list is very revealing – especially notable are species listed as EW - http://www.carespreservation.com/priority_list.html - many of these species CAN still be found, primarily through hobbyist circles.  Now maybe institutions are working with these as well, but we don’t know that.  Still, if you want a young trio of a fish that is extinct in the wild, such as Ameca splendens, well, AquaBid may well have it - http://www.aquabid.com/cgi-bin/auction/auction.cgi?fwlivebearersw&1328510384 (it’s a fairly easy species to come by as it turns out)Will a species like Ameca splendens ever get reintroduced?  I can’t say.    Is a species like that ever going to be a mainstream commercial success, bred by the tens of thousands?  No.  So, if the species ISN’T in any institutional SSPs, then where is the one last bastion of hope, the failsafe, for Ameca splendens?  it lies with the freshwater hobbyist fish breeders who keep it going.  I hate to think that any of our marine species could come to that, but I’d also like to be darn sure that we THINK about it and act appropriately in the event that something bad DOES happen.

    Of course, I’m for the ongoing well-managed sustainable fishery of aquarium fishes in Hawaii.  I don’t think ANY species should be banned / off limits unless data backs up a management body’s decision to do so.  Since we are currently looking at partial/complete bans being proposed, I look back to a fish like Ameca splendens, and I realize that if collection of it had been banned way back when, if the species had never made it into the aquarium hobby, it would in fact be extinct now, instead of being sheparded forward by concerned private aquarists.  Examples like that motivate me to do sometihng like try to ark Blue Lined Butterflyfish.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Junkai-Ong/546235520 Junkai Ong

    I’ve set aside a pair of Cirrhitops fasciatus & a whole colony of strawberry crabs. :D

  • Anonymous

    A little OT here but when the Aquarium trade is baned we could always pop over a have a little sushi.

    http://www.hiloliving.com/HiloDec09Blog.html