More details on the forthcoming Maxspect Mazarra X

By on Mar 21, 2012

Maxspect Mazarra (Mazarra X not shown)

With the new Maxspect Mazarra X being snuck into Reefstock recently, and Mr. Saltwater Tank doing a brief video clip on it, we assume there are many of you who are really itching to find out more information about this upcoming fixture. Well, we have details.

The Mazarra X is basically an upgraded Mazarra S, with some of the same limitations and functionality in tow, but will be geared to sit closer to the Mazarra P in terms of overall performance, even if it doesn’t have all the bells and whistles. That’s not a bad thing though, as this is still going to be a very capable fixture, at a very eye catching price.

With the Mazarra X being based off the original Mazarra S, which ended up evolving into the Mazarra P, it still shares the same glossy piano black finish. The mounting system is also the same with all the ball joints and extruded aluminum sections to make almost any mounting system that you could want.

As the video mentioned before, wireless connectivity between modules is gone in favor of a less expensive wired connection. The units are daisy-chained together using a small cable with 3.5mm audio style jacks doing the connection duties. The master module has a controller built into the unit that is similar to the Mazarra S, and does the usual duties of keeping time, setting the brightness of each LED channel automatically and manually, controlling the moonlight settings, and setting the fan temperature trigger points. All of the slave units, of which you can connect up to 16 to a single master module, are basically dumb, and follow the direction of the master module. As a result, advanced features that would be found on the P like daylight simulation and cloud cover are out. What is interesting is that the slave modules are capable of being run on their own, but at a fixed 100% output with the fan running constantly.

The Mazarra X uses the same LED channel layout as the Mazarra S (right)

On the LED front, the Mazarra X is limited to two controllable LED channels; white and blue. While there isn’t anything out of the ordinary with this compared to other dimmable fixtures on the market, what really sets this one apart form the others is the LEDs that are used within. Some have speculated that because of it’s lower price point that it would be resorting to just using Bridgelux based LEDs to keep costs at a minimum.

Color us surprised when we saw that these fixtures will be fitted with Cree LEDs right out of the gate. As of right now, it slated to have Cree XB-Ds in 8,000K cool white (6 pieces) and 3,500K warm white (2 pieces) to give a full and balanced base spectrum, with tried and trued XP-E 450nm royal blue (4 pieces) and 470nm blue (4 pieces) LEDs adding in the blue punch. XB-D LEDs were a great choice in keeping the overall quality up while keeping costs down, thanks to the silicon carbide technology that Cree has been working on, and that we have covered here in the past.

Outside of that, the differences between the X and the S are pretty minimal. What has changed is a slight increase in the number of time points that can be set for each LED channel. While it’s not the eight that you will find with the Mazarra P, six time points gives you a little more fine control over the photo period than the four that was found with the S.

When the fixture goes to market here soon, potential customers will find this as a kit with one master module, one slave module, one power supply (capable of running up to two modules), a full set of 40 degree and 100 degree secondary lenses (70 degree lenses are installed by default), and the usual mounting frame parts to let you build up your mounting system the way you want it. The target MSRP for the kit is supposed to be in the $500 range. We have yet to hear what the price is for individual slave modules, but you can bet that it’s going to be very reasonable.

Seeing as the Mazarra X has yet to hit production, there is still the chance that some details may change at the last minute, but we will keep you informed on anything we find.

Posted in Equipment |
Search More:  
   
  • http://twitter.com/iiiDream Corey Larson

    Nice to see you writing here Clive! Definitely an article you know something about. I seriously hope the details won’t change much, as this is a dream unit for those who want and love LEDs as far as colors and price. I truly hope they sell individual parts like the P-series, because I’d only use a master unit and mount over my biocube, but then later on be able to add a slave + railing for a future tank

  • CaliReefer

    The newest trend seems to be in favor of ditching “cool blue” LEDs, 470nm, and going with 420nm instead because it is so much more beneficial to a reef tank (corals and bacteria).

    Does this light have the option of going with 420nm over the standard 470nm LEDs?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_TY62P4IMCIOGM5T3WOGV625FII The Jesus

    Wow, that’s a spectacular price for the kit.  I’ve had a MaxSpect G2-160 for more than 2 years and I love it.  Maybe they’ll cut me a deal on it since I was willing to take a chance on them two years ago, lol.  Anway, if this does hit the market at $500 (for the entire kit), I’ll definitely be replacing the T5′s on my 55g mixed reef with this.  I imagine that these are going to sell very quickly at that price.

  • Clive Bentley

    If the details change from here to the release date, I’m betting it will only be for the better based on what we have heard up to this point. The version that Jake recieved and Mr. Saltwater Tank TV previewed was actually different from what was described above. At the time, they were still waiting on pricing for certain components before setting the configuration in stone.

    I’m sure that individual parts will become available a while after the first round of kits come out. Like you, we are all interested to see what the final pricing will be for all the associated parts. I would bet the price for the master will be similar to what the Mazarra S was (around $300 online), but with much better performance than the S.

  • Clive Bentley

    I personally think that 470nm LEDs have a lot of benefit for overall color, when used correctly. Too much, and it can really kill the look of a tank. 420nm has a lot of benefit for PAR/PUR production, but I don’t think it should be regarded as a replacement.

    I’m not 100% sure right now if the optional 420nm LEDs that Maxspect offers will be compatible. They have a current limit of 700mA, while all indications point to both LED channels on the fixture being 1000mA. Granted, you can limit the overall output of the channel that you use them on, but mistakes can be made. It might not be something that Maxspect condones. When we find out, we’ll let you know.

  • CaliReefer

    470nm is certainly a personal preference, some like them, some hate them. I run 8 of them on my 48 LED light myself, but I have been seriously debating swapping a couple out, along with my 4 cyans, for some 420nm. I didn’t realize until recently how important a role 420nm played in regards to bacteria until I saw this thread on RC. 
    http://tinyurl.com/8844tnu

    I understand what your saying about the 700mA limitation right now, and I can see that as being a reason why Maxspect wouldn’t offer them at this time. 

    Question for you Clive, have you heard of any 1000mA 420nm LEDs coming down the supply line? I am sure we will see them at some point, just curious how soon that may be.

  • http://www.facebook.com/Maxspect Maxspect LED

    The current Mazarra-P’s are already using dual-core 410nm-420nm Super Actinic chips driven at 1000mA, in fact we’re the first manufacturer to promote the use of 410nm-420nm chip in LED fixtures.

    We totally understand the importance of the 410nm-420nm spectrum, while the majority of LED fixtures out there are using 440nm-470nm “Royal Blue”, they lack the 410nm-420nm spectrum that’s required by Chlorophyll A for photosynthesis (absorption peak at 412nm).

    This is a sample of the triple-core 410nm-420nm Super Actinic that’s compatible with the Mazarra, and we’re planning to use them in our future products, too.
    http://tinyurl.com/7t97v3k

    Answering your question, while we have not finalized the specifications on the Mazarra-X, I don’t see why we cannot use the same chips on the X, too.

    See more information about the 410nm-420nm chip we used in the Mazarra here:
    https://www.facebook.com/Maxspect

  • CaliReefer

    Awesome! Thanks for the info. Even though I am a DIY myself, the Maxspect fixtures are the only ones I recommend to others wanting a fixture and this is just one more reason (besides the many other obvious like price, ease of swapping out LEDs/Optics, swivel mount, slim footprint, etc) to choose a Maxspect fixture.