New study documents increased growth of staghorn Acropora in higher phosphate levels

By on Dec 05, 2011

Staghorn Acropora was kept at three phosphate levels and the corals in the highest concentration grew the fastest

Acropora corals are a mysterious creature with complex needs and one of those that we thought we’d nailed long ago was their “need” for minimal phosphate concentration in the water. A new study by Dunn et. al. which will be published in January 2012 in the Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology showed that Acropora muricata (A. formosa) grew significantly faster at phosphate concentration of 0.5 mg/l (ppm) than at 0.2 or 0.09 mg/l.

The study begins by noting in the abstract that high phosphate levels do all kinds of things to corals including affecting their growth and skeleton density, zoox. concentrations and fecundity – in personal communication with Jeremy Dunn we learned that it was the expectations of the research that growth rate would be diminished in the high phosphate group.

After keeping genetically distinct samples of Acropora muriata in the three treatments for four months the corals were analyzed for length, weight, density and even coloration of the growth margins. The Acropora grew in all four treatments: slowest at the lowest level of phosphate and they grew fastest at the high phosphate concentration of 0.5mg/l. The study notes that although phosphate increased overall growth, it led to lower skeletal density – this is perhaps not that much of an issue in aquariums but in the wild it would lead to more brittle branches that would be more susceptible to breaking in strong flow.

All the corals appeared healthy as evidenced by the regular extension of the polyps, no recession and no mortalities. It is believed that these Acropora grew faster with increasing phosphate level due to a higher concentration of zooxanthellae, which was also noticeable in the coloration of the corals in the separate treatment groups. Although all the corals started off the experiment with strong presence of white growth margins at the axial tips and the base, in the high phosphate group the growth margins were mostly brown whereas the low phosphate group still had noticeable white margins.

This study of Acropora corals in aquarium and published in a peer-reviewed journal is important not only for its results but also for the coral science field doing research using aquariums which hits very close to home for the everyday reef aquarium hobbyist. As with all things in life, the topic of phosphate and coral growth is not black and white and perhaps future studies of this kind may be able to tease out more details about growing corals in captivity. Big thanks to Dr. Sammarco and Jeremy Dunn for providing their time and materials about this significant coral aquarium research.

Posted in Breaking |
Search More:  
   
  • http://www.facebook.com/BoomerMn Boomer William Wing

    Interesting Jake but need to see more and not just on species.

  • Anonymous

    Low PO4 = slow growth and better clouration whereas raised PO4 = high growth and brown corals.

    I know what most would opt for. Patience reaps rewards!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rodney-Azarmi/1567130601 Rodney Azarmi

    I think it is easy to forget that Nitrates and Phosphates are core nutrients for all autotrophs. With modern filtration methods it’s not hard to completely deplete phosphate. In my mixed reef, I’ve noticed reduced growth and even tissue recession with my hard corals when using larger amounts of ferric oxide. My soft corals and LPS seem less effected from depleted Phosphates. I suspect that the soft and LPS corals that rely more on feeding, are more tolerant of ultra low phosphate levels.

  • http://twitter.com/Faviafreak Faviafreak

    go skimmerless

  • http://twitter.com/Faviafreak Faviafreak

    go skimmerless

  • http://twitter.com/AwItsLinnikins Linny

    You’re crazy.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001443324671 Patrick Jewell

    Like to read the full paper, but ya gotta pay for it! Probably 30 bucks to read (rent) for 24 hours. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=836680590 Jake Graving

    It seems to me that you’re fallaciously spinning a research story for your own benefit. You do briefly mention this in your article, but you definitely don’t place enough importance on it. 

    “Density decreased through time, and was significantly lowest in the high phosphate treatment . . . Increased phosphate concentrations, often characteristic of eutrophic conditions, caused increased coral growth but also a more brittle skeleton. The latter is likely more susceptible to breakage and damage from other destructive forces (e.g., bioerosion) and makes increased coral growth a poor indicator of reef health.”

    That’s all I needed to read. Low density growth is not good growth and would not contribute to any type of reef building. If anything, elevated phosphate levels would lead to reef degredation.

    See the following for more info…

    Mechanical Properties of Coral Skeleton: Compressive Strength and its Adaptive Significance
    John A. Chamberlain, Jr.
    Paleobiology
    Vol. 4, No. 4 (Autumn, 1978), pp. 419-435